EAA2025 Workshop
Thyssen Workshop
Experimental argument analysis:
Interdisciplinary perspectives on verbal reasoning
July 9-10, 2025 University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
CFP and Programme
This workshop will directly precede the 5th European Experimental Philosophy conference in Norwich, UK. The workshop will bring together researchers from experimental philosophy, cognitive psychology, and experimental linguistics, to open up the experimental philosophy of verbal reasoning as a new interdisciplinary field of study.
Call for papers
There will be 3 slots for submitted papers that address the research questions below. Accommodation will be covered for the 3 presenters. Any papers not accepted to the workshop will automatically be considered for the experimental philosophy conference. Papers will be allocated a 40-minute slot and should leave 10-15 minutes for discussion. Anonymized abstracts of up to 500 words (not counting references or figure captions) should be submitted through the submission point for the 5th European X-Phi conference. Please indicate that you submit the abstract for a talk at the EAA workshop.
Deadline: March 1st, 2025.
Questions:
To help develop interdisciplinary experimental argument analysis as a fruitful successor project to traditional conceptual analysis that benefits from advances in cognitive psychology and experimental linguistics, this workshop will address questions about methods, cognitive mechanisms, and philosophical applications:
- Methods: How can empirical studies support the reconstruction or evaluation of verbal reasoning? Which conceptual and empirical tools can be adapted for this purpose and how? How can formal and experimental methods be combined to facilitate normative evaluation?
- Mechanisms: How do automatic comprehension and production inferences shape verbal reasoning? What biases affect such inferences? Which factors affect specifically the contextualization of default inferences? How are irregular polysemes processed? What norms do people rely on for specific arguments of interest? How much individual variation is there in this respect?
- Applications: How can insights into language processing, and specifically polysemy processing, support the assessment of philosophical arguments? How effective are verbal arguments at changing people’s minds? Which aspects of automatic language processing influence the persuasiveness of verbal arguments? To what extent do such arguments contribute to philosophical puzzles and paradoxes? How can insight into automatic language processing support the improvement of our conceptual tools?
Provisional Programme
Tuesday 9th July 2025
Reasoning with polysemous words: Detecting and processing ambiguity
9:30-10:30: Agustin Vicente (Basque Country): How to decide whether a (philosophical) term is polysemous: Linguistic tests may not be enough
10:30-11:00: Coffee Break
11:00-12:00: Lucy Macgregor (Cambridge): What’s your jam? Cognitive and neural mechanisms of semantic ambiguity resolution
Reasoning with polysemous words: Mechanisms, biases and fallacies
12:00-13:00: Richard Breheny (UCL): Modelling salience and modelling pragmatic inference – what’s the connection?
13:00-14:00: Lunch
14:00-15:00: Valentina Bambini (IUSS Pavia): Inferring metaphorical meanings: How typical and atypical brains use multimodal information
15:00-16:00: Francesca Ervas (Cagliari): Experimenting with metaphors in conditional reasoning
16:00-16:30: Coffee Break
Empirical tools for normative evaluation
16:30-17:30: Kevin Reuter (Zurich): Verbal reasoning and rational communicators: Experimental and theoretical perspectives
17:30-18:30: Niels Skovgaard-Olsen (Freiburg): Markov Violations and Hidden Mechanisms
Thursday 10th July 2024
Submitted paper session
09:30-10:10 Paper 1
10:10-10:50 Paper 2
10:50-11:30 Paper 3
11:30-12:00 Coffee Break
Future Directions
12:00-13:00 Eugen Fischer (University of East Anglia): Experimental argument analysis: Research program and paradigm (with Paul Engelhardt & Dimitra Lazaridou-Chatzigoga)
13:00-14:00 Lunch
Closing keynote
14:00-15:00 Edouard Machery (Pittsburgh): Why can’t philosophers agree? The psychological sources of irremediable plurality of views in philosophy
Organizers: Eugen Fischer, Paul Engelhardt, Dimitra Lazaridou-Chatzigoga
For any questions about conference or workshop, please email: xphieurope2025@gmail.com
We thank the Fritz Thyssen Foundation for generous support of the workshop.