EAA2025 Workshop

Thyssen Workshop

Experimental argument analysis:

July 9-10, 2025 University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK

CFP and Programme

This workshop will directly precede the 5th European Experimental Philosophy conference in Norwich, UK. The workshop will bring together researchers from experimental philosophy, cognitive psychology, and experimental linguistics, to open up the experimental philosophy of verbal reasoning as a new interdisciplinary field of study.

Call for papers

There will be 3 slots for submitted papers that address the research questions below. Accommodation will be covered for the 3 presenters. Any papers not accepted to the workshop will automatically be considered for the experimental philosophy conference. Papers will be allocated a 40-minute slot and should leave 10-15 minutes for discussion. Anonymized abstracts of up to 500 words (not counting references or figure captions) should be submitted through the submission point for the 5th European X-Phi conference. Please indicate that you submit the abstract for a talk at the EAA workshop.

Deadline: March 1st, 2025.

Submission link

Questions:

To help develop interdisciplinary experimental argument analysis as a fruitful successor project to traditional conceptual analysis that benefits from advances in cognitive psychology and experimental linguistics, this workshop will address questions about methods, cognitive mechanisms, and philosophical applications:

  • Methods: How can empirical studies support the reconstruction or evaluation of verbal reasoning? Which conceptual and empirical tools can be adapted for this purpose and how? How can formal and experimental methods be combined to facilitate normative evaluation?
  • Mechanisms: How do automatic comprehension and production inferences shape verbal reasoning? What biases affect such inferences? Which factors affect specifically the contextualization of default inferences? How are irregular polysemes processed? What norms do people rely on for specific arguments of interest? How much individual variation is there in this respect?
  • Applications: How can insights into language processing, and specifically polysemy processing, support the assessment of philosophical arguments? How effective are verbal arguments at changing people’s minds? Which aspects of automatic language processing influence the persuasiveness of verbal arguments? To what extent do such arguments contribute to philosophical puzzles and paradoxes? How can insight into automatic language processing support the improvement of our conceptual tools?

Provisional Programme

Wednesday 9th July 2025

Reasoning with polysemous words: Detecting and processing ambiguity

9:30-10:30: Agustin Vicente (Basque Country): How to decide whether a (philosophical) term is polysemous: Linguistic tests may not be enough

10:30-11:00: Coffee Break

11:00-12:00: Lucy Macgregor (Cambridge): What’s your jam? Cognitive and neural mechanisms of semantic ambiguity resolution

Reasoning with polysemous words: Mechanisms, biases and fallacies

12:00-13:00: Richard Breheny (UCL): Modelling salience and modelling pragmatic inference – what’s the connection?

13:00-14:00: Lunch

14:00-15:00: Valentina Bambini (IUSS Pavia): Inferring metaphorical meanings: How typical and atypical brains use multimodal information

15:00-16:00: Francesca Ervas (Cagliari): Experimenting with metaphors in conditional reasoning

16:00-16:30: Coffee Break

Empirical tools for normative evaluation

16:30-17:30: Kevin Reuter (Zurich): Verbal reasoning and rational communicators: Experimental and theoretical perspectives

17:30-18:30: Niels Skovgaard-Olsen (Freiburg): Markov Violations and Hidden Mechanisms


Thursday 10th July 2025

Submitted paper session

09:30-10:10 Nick Byrd (Geisinger College of Health Sciences): Map my words - Using Waitlist Controlled Trials To Test Whether Argument Mapping Improves Individuals’ Persuasive Writing or Critical Thinking

10:10-10:50 Elisa Franchetti (University of Edinburgh): Modifying beliefs through attention: persuasion via presupposition in semantic illusions

10:50-11:30 Elliot Schwarz (CUNY): Polysemy and Inference: Reasoning with Underspecified Representations

11:30-12:00 Coffee Break

Future Directions

12:00-13:00 Eugen Fischer (University of East Anglia): Experimental argument analysis: Research program and paradigm (with Paul Engelhardt & Dimitra Lazaridou-Chatzigoga)

13:00-14:00 Lunch

Closing keynote

14:00-15:00 Edouard Machery (Pittsburgh): Why can’t philosophers agree? The psychological sources of irremediable plurality of views in philosophy

Venue and practical information

Registration for the workshop and the conference is now open and will close on June 16th, 2025. Please visit the following registration link: https://store.uea.ac.uk/conferences-and-events/faculty-of-arts-and-humanities/conferencesevents/5th-european-experimental-philosophy-conference

Euro X-Phi 2025 will take place at the University of East Anglia in Norwich, just under two hours by train from London. The tourist prospectus says: “Norwich is the most complete medieval city in the UK with stunning Norman Cathedral and Castle, a quaint covered market, lively restaurants, bars and nightlife, and a heritage that is a delight to explore.” All true. Also, the finest beaches in the country are just an hour away. Consider staying for an extra day!

Norwich is easily accessible by train from all London airports except Luton. The closest are London-City and Stansted airport. The most convenient (but pricier) airport is Norwich International Airport, via Amsterdam. For on-campus accommodation, contact the Broadview Hotel.

Organizers: Eugen Fischer, Paul Engelhardt, Dimitra Lazaridou-Chatzigoga

For any questions about conference or workshop, please email: xphieurope2025@gmail.com

We thank the Fritz Thyssen Foundation for generous support of the workshop.

Fritz Thyssen Stiftung